Historical Water Governance in Turkmenistan and the Challenges of Soviet Interventions

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58981/bluepapers.2026.1.05

Published

2026-02-21

Issue

Section

challenges, concepts and new approaches

How to Cite

Historical Water Governance in Turkmenistan and the Challenges of Soviet Interventions. (2026). Blue Papers, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.58981/bluepapers.2026.1.05

Keywords:

USSR, irrigation system, environmental degradation, water management, local stakeholders

Abstract

This article investigates historical water management practices in Turkmenistan and the development of canal construction technology, comparing the operation of traditional irrigation canals with Soviet water management policies. It explores how Soviet officials regarded water and used water management to consolidate state power and advance the region economically, arguing that centralized Soviet water management policies, which largely disregarded local expertise and participation, ultimately proved unsustainable and environmentally destructive. The article underscores the need to include diverse stakeholders in decision-making processes to avoid perpetuating outdated practices, further exacerbating the deterioration of the environment and societal customs.

Author Biography

  • Estere Cvilikovska, Delft University of Technology

    Estere Cvilikovska is a second-year student in the master’s degree track in architecture at the Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment at TU Delft. In the Architectural History Thesis course, she conducted research on the perception of water and its effects on the development of cities in Soviet Turkmenistan.

References

Atajevs, Č. 1974. “Padomju Turkmēnijai Piecdesmit” [Soviet Turkmenistan fifties]. Zvaigzne (September).

Верный, Владимир. 2023. Мои Каракумы [My karakums]. Записки гидростроителя. Ridero.

Brite, Elizabeth Baker. 2018. “The Hydrosocial Empire: The Karakum River and the Soviet Conquest of Central Asia in the 20th Century.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 52 (December): 123–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2018.08.003.

D’Agostino, Matteo, and Carola Hein. 2024. “Design-Based Solutions for Water Challenges: The Value Case Approach.” Blue Papers 3 (1): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.58981/bluepapers.2024.1.06.

Edgar, Adrienne Lynn. 2004. Tribal Nation: The Making of Soviet Turkmenistan. Princeton University Press.

Korzuna, L. 1982. “Ašhabada: jaunība 100 gadu vecumā” [Ashgabat: youth at 100 years old]. Rīgas Balss (November).

Linton, Jamie. 2010. What Is Water? The History of a Modern Abstraction. UBC Press.

Mukerji, Chandra. 2021. “The Agency of Water and the Canal Du Midi.” In Hydrohumanities, edited by Rina C. Faletti and Ignacio López-Calvo, 23–41. University of California Press.

Neimanis, Astrida. 2017. Bodies of Water: Posthuman Feminist Phenomenology. Bloomsbury Academic.

Obertreis, Julia. 2017. Imperial Desert Dreams. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Verlage.

O’Hara, Sarah L. 1999. “Irrigation and Water Management in Turkmenistan: Past Systems, Present Problems and Future Scenarios.” Europe-Asia Studies 51 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139999100.

Peterson, Maya Karin. 2019. Pipe Dreams: Water and Empire in Central Asia’s Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge University Press.

Pritchard, Sara B. 2011. Confluence. The Nature of Technology and the Remaking of the Rhône. Harvard University Press.

Rogočovs, I. 1974. “Dzīvības Upe, Draudzības Upe” [River of life, river of friendship]. Cīņa (May 24).

Swyngedouw, Erik. 2015. Liquid Power: Water and Contested Modernities in Spain, 1898- 2010. The MIT Press.

Zonn, Igor S., and Andrey G. Kostianoy. 2013. The Turkmen Lake Altyn Asyr and Water Resources in Turkmenistan. Springer.